| |
|
|
|
|
By Dr. Martin Collis Physical activity is the friend of the body/mind. Inactivity is an ally of disease. In the past few years we have seen with inconvertible clarity the fact that lack of movement is linked to many of the major diseases that kill and disable us. The truth knocks on our doors, whispers in our collective ear, shines from the print of our books and computers and we say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth." We recline on our Lazy Boys, our fingers read the buttons of the remote control like Braille and hour and after hour we watch murders and mayhem and the 24/7 tabloid tattoo of CNN with sports scores and regional temperatures scrolling beneath. We await the next 'medical miracle' which will save our bloated bodies and the popular press gives us hope.
We read that Dr. Saunders Williams of the Duke University School of Medicine has developed a pill that builds strength and endurance in the muscles of mice. Using the Mice and Men approach it is not hard to extend the premise of this research so that we will soon have muscle pills for the human species to be washed down with beer or soft drinks while changing channels.
So reads another headline about the same story, and people live their lives in pursuit of the loophole and die of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer. The beneficial relationship between exercise and cancer is less clear than between the exercise and heart disease, stroke and diabetes. It's not hard to see why. There are many different cancers whose etiology is complex and often unknown. We do know that cancers can be triggered by genetics, cigarette smoke, stress, asbestos, fiberglass, diesel fuel, sunlight, radiation, preservatives, pollution and pesticides. There was an old rock song that featured the lyric, "Everything causes cancer." and at times it seems that way. With multiple cancers and multiple causes it's not surprising that it has been challenging to see a statistically clear positive relationship between:
Another reason for the lack of clarity is the way in which many research studies have chosen to measure or record 'physical activity.' In the past two years I've participated in three important conferences that concerned the linkage between physical activity and cancer.
In point form here is a summary of some of the current knowledge and thinking regarding the relationships between exercise and the prevention and treatment of cancer. Data from Analysis of Multiple Studies.
Data from Large Number Individual Studies.
Writing for 'Well' I try to avoid citing long lists of studies, but in
this case I think it is important to show that there are convincing data
showing that physical activity is a significant factor in cancer prevention.
The truth is that regular physical activity is almost certainly more beneficial
than the studies indicate. Most of the larger number epidemiological studies use questionnaires to assess people's physical activity level. In the past many of the questions regarding exercise have been vague and the answers hard to classify. People overestimate the amount of exercise they do, or to put it bluntly, people lie to themselves and the researchers. There have now been a number of studies in which subjects responded to a questionnaire about their physical activity and then had their cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) objectively measured on a treadmill or cycle ergometer. In every study I have seen correlation between exercise and disease jumped when actual measured data were used. In some cancer studies the results went from showing no relationship between physical activity and cancer prevention (questionnaire responses) to a strong statistical relationship. (Objective measure of CRF). In the April 2002 Tufts Health and Nutrition Letter there is a report on a study by Dr. G. Duncan in which he says, 'people think they are pushing themselves harder than they are.' In this study, the subjects wore heart rate monitors and were also asked questions about their exercise intensity. Almost half the participants, who averaged in their late 40's, thought they exercised at least 'moderately.' But only 15% actually did. The American Cancer Society estimates that if everybody exercised and controlled their weight, the number of Americans who die of cancer would drop by about one third. About an equal number of new cases would be prevented. Physical Activity and Cancer Treatment Cancer can be like high speed aging, and the treatment of cancer can be so debilitating that it becomes a risk factor itself. Chemo and radiation therapy can leave the patient nauseous, bone tired, with their immune system compromised and their hemoglobin way down. My wife, Nancy, works with many cancer patients whom she describes as 'being blindsided by fatigue.' Not surprisingly, people in this condition often take to their beds and try to eat easily digestible foods. But bed-rest can compound the problems the body is already facing with the cancer treatments. After 72 hours in bed, glucose tolerance can look like diabetes, blood coagulation increases, leading to dangers of clotting, muscles atrophy and osteoporosis begins. Also, the mind is getting a message from the body, which is immobile and horizontal, that there are major problems. It is important that physicians council their patients on the value of maintaining some form of physical activity during treatment if possible. The fatigue can be ameliorated by the use of Eprex and other drugs that elevate hemoglobin. Drugs such as Neupogen, which helps increase the white blood cell count, can boost the immune system. The research on exercise as part of cancer treatment is not extensive, but is growing. Schwartz et al. in an article titled 'Fatigue, Breast Cancer and Chemotherapy' reported that far from increasing fatigue, exercise seemed to do the opposite. They note that, "Exercise seemed to change the perception of fatigue and its intensity.' These findings were echoed in the May 2002 'Consumer Reports on Health' in an article titled 'Exercise Fights Chemo. Fatigue.' A study, at the Oregon Cancer Center, of women undergoing breast cancer treatment found women felt 14 35% less fatigued on the days on which they did the recommended 15 30 minutes moderate exercise. Roanne Segal's work at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center now has good data on the effectiveness of exercise during treatment, and she makes some interesting distinctions with different exercise regimens for different types of treatment.
These are not exclusive to each type of treatment,
but remind us that one exercise program does not fit all. Courneya and
Friedenreich summarized 24 empirical studies and noted that physical activity
led to improvements in cardio-respiratory fitness, muscle strength and
body composition. People were less fatigued and nausea was more manageable.
Quality of life improved, as did self-esteem, general morale and ability
to deal with depression.
The ever macho and remarkable Lance Armstrong in his book 'It's Not About the Bike' says, "During those first weeks of chemo I had to keep moving. 'Move' I told myself. I would get up, throw up, put on my Walkman and walk." It is worth noting that during treatments Armstrong refused hospital food saying that his body needed only high quality nutrition in order to fight cancer. The finest line in the book is his comment about the importance of belief. He wasn't religious but said, "I believed in belief for its own shining sake." One of my heroes, George Sheehan, a physician/runner, who died of prostate cancer that metastasized into the bone, wrote about his cancer in 'Going the Distance.' (Which he referred to as 'my death book'?) "The patient's responsibility is to follow a lifestyle that will add hours to their day. To follow a program that gives meaning and purpose to their final years, no matter how few they may be." The Goldilocks Principle How much exercise is appropriate to help prevent cancer? Not too little, not too much, but just right. Too little exercise, as we have pointed out, is associated with sickness. Too much, or exercise at too high an intensity, could possibly cause DNA damage and an increase in free radicals, both of which are associated with cancer. (I should add that the benefits associated with a high performance lifestyle far, far outweigh the rather remote possibility of cancerous cell damage.) The American Cancer Society Guidelines suggest the following.
The Mechanisms. Why does exercise reduce the incidence of cancer? The mechanisms by which regular exercise prevents cancers are not clear-cut. There are many cancers and there are probably many reasons why exercise plays a role in cancer prevention and recovery. The most simplistic is that the human body/mind is designed to move and that opportunistic disease flourishes where there is little movement. (This is simple, but as Schweitzer reminded us, we can progress from naïve simplicity to profound simplicity.) Physical activity is a known stress reducer (Remember the 3 A's Activity Absorbs Anxiety). Exercise increases immune cell function (e.g. T lymphocytes, natural killers cells, and macrophages). Exercise helps weight control and overweight is associated with cancer. The strong relationship between exercise and a decrease in colon cancer might be associated with enhanced transit time in the gut, lower insulin levels and altered bile acid metabolism. There is much we don't know and much to be learned, and we certainly can't wait to take action until, 'all the information is in.' It never will be. Since Richard Nixon declared his 'War on Cancer' in 1971 some 30 billion dollars has been spent. (If 30 billion over 30 years sounds like a lot of money, it is less than the fast food industry spends in one year on promotion. Is it any wonder we're struggling to influence people's lifestyle and eating habits.) I didn't like Richard Nixon and I don't like military metaphors in dealing with a disease like cancer. Jeanette Rankin's famous comment is that, "You can no more win a war than you can win an earthquake." Decreasing the incidence and deaths from cancer requires finesse, patience and cultural shifts, not a war. One of the challenging questions is, how to make the most effective use of the billions of dollars obtained to help lead to a major decrease in both the incidence of cancer and deaths from cancer. There are four major areas where money can be spent namely, basic research, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. A figure one often hears is that more than 70% of cancers have their origins in lifestyle. This being so, I feel there is a strong case to be made for allocating a greater percentage of the cancer dollars to programs of prevention, lifestyle and public health. Like the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan and the War on Drugs, the War on Cancer can drag on and yield some statistics, which are hard to justify at first glance. In 1971, the year the war was declared, 335,000 Americans died of cancer, 25 years, and $25 billion later in 1996, 547,000 Americans died of cancer. (Close to the number of Americans that died fighting for their country in the 20th century.) It is often said that more people make a living from cancer than die from it. There has probably been far too much emphasis on discovering 'the magic bullet' and the big money corporate cure rather than helping create an environment and a cultural lifestyle which is not a good host for cancer. Cancer is the number one cause of death in children from 1 14 years and in women aged 35 75. In the past half century breast cancer has increased 60% and prostate cancer 200% and the overall incidence of cancer seems to be growing in all age groups.
The news is not all bad however. Although the incidence of cancer is up, deaths from cancer have been declining for the past few years since 1998. This reflects earlier detection and more effective treatment. There are now about 8 million cancer survivors in the U.S.A. and since 1971 overall survival rates have nearly doubled. Childhood leukemia and Hodgkins disease have been major success stories. With the decrease in smoking, lung cancer is on the decline, a decline that will continue if we make smoking less and less socially acceptable. There are real breakthroughs in understanding the molecular and genetic processes of the cancer cell. Leading epidemiologist, J.C. Bailar of University of Chicago, sums things up by saying, "I think it's foolish to think that some day we'll find cures for cancer. We cannot base national strategy on that kind of hope." He feels we must make prevention a top priority, while continuing work to try to pin point causation. I agree with Dr. Bailar about the primacy of prevention and identifying the causes of cancer, but I feel he is a bit cavalier in his comments about discovering cures. Thirty five years ago as a student at Stanford I remember being puzzled by one of my old professors, Nobel Laureate Joshua Lederberg, who spoke briefly of the possibility of viruses being used to treat cancer. There have always been rumors about people whose tumors regressed when they had the flu or other viral infection, and now there seems to be growing substance to the paradoxical situation in which one disease fights another, although the principle of antibiotics is not too dissimilar from this. Work is now going on at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center, Stanford University, Harvard and Duke, and many other institutions in which animals with cancerous tumors are being infected with a variety of viruses from herpes to the common cold. Speaking of tumor cells, Dr. Bell of the University of Ottawa notes, "They have thrown out genes that inhibit their growth, but at the same time they've thrown out their anti-viral programming." Human trials are now underway. Michael Wosnick, director of research at the National Cancer Institute of Canada noted, "all logic says it should work." Dr. Bell has said, "I think we're going to find out that some viruses are going to be good at targeting some cancers, and that other viruses will get other cancers." The drawback of using viruses to attack tumors is that it has to be an on-going treatment and the patient will experience symptoms from the virus. However, that seems to be a price worth paying if cancer can be transformed from a killer into a manageable chronic disease. As Emily Dickinson told us. "Hope is the thing with feathers I believe that many of the answers lie outside the walls of the hospitals and research labs and that any initiative to rein in cancer will be doomed to failure unless we provide enormous human and fiscal resources to address lifestyle and environmental issues. My local bank sponsors a fundraiser for breast cancer titled 'Run for the Cure', which is an interesting double entendre. You can run 10K and raise some money for research, or jog on your own and literally run away from a sedentary disease inducing lifestyle. The final word is that exercise does not stop with the cure, or when cancer goes into remission. Having been struck by the 2 by 4 of a cancer diagnosis and recovered, now is the time, not to 'put your affairs in order' but to put your life in order. Become the person you want to be, eat well, look very carefully at stressful jobs and situations and above all, move. As I've noted before, the key word in the human potential movement is 'movement.' Buy a bike, join a fitness club, get a pedometer for a step by step recovery. The possibilities are limitless. In the Fall 1999 edition of 'Well', Dino Asproloupos wrote about 10 teams of breast cancer survivors who were paddling in the Alcan Dragon Boat Festival in front of 40,000 spectators. The group known as 'Abreast in a Boat' has been featured on TV and many magazines and has helped re-shape the way physicians prescribe physical fitness activities to breast cancer survivors.
Funny how he always suggests exercise. C.A.N.C.E.R. There are many similarities between the lifestyle and mindset for cancer prevention and cancer treatment. These can be summed up by the acronym C.A.N.C.E.R. C. Choice A. Attitude The greatest discovery of my generation
is that human beings can alter their lives by altering their attitudes
of mind. N. Nutrition C. Control of Stress E. Exercise R. Relationships Fund Raising for Cancer.
There has to be a better advertising placement for raising money to "conquer" cancer than a matchbook cover. But this old matchbook reminded people "every 3 minutes someone dies of cancer" and "guard those you love." A few months back I addressed the staff of the Bone Marrow Transplant and Leukemia Unit of Vancouver General Hospital. One of their many successful patients was Adella Krall whose daughter, Diana, is one of the great jazz divas in the world. In one of those 'everybody wins' situations, each year Diana gives an exclusive performance to raise funds for the BMT Unit. Diana gets to support her mother, Adella was able to provide financial support for the hospital and people like Nancy and me get to spend a pretty special evening listening to Diana in a very intimate setting. I am always amazed at how a middle class white girl from Nanaimo can inhabit those bleak, desperate songs that make up some of the standards of jazz. But when Diana sang "Cry Me A River" she was tapping into some of those universal feelings of pain we've all experienced. The BMT Unit was able to raise over a quarter of a million dollars, and best of all, Adella was able to sit and listen to her daughter. As a sad addendum to this, Adella Krall died very recently at age 60. I knew her when she was a teacher in Nanaimo and had a good conversation with her at Diana's evening. She was first diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 1996 and seemed to respond well to her bone marrow transplant and went back to teaching for a while, but she had a relapse in 2000 and underwent a second transplant in Sept. 2001. Cancer is a roller coaster disease in which apparent gains can be suddenly snatched away. We all wish she could have lived longer, but here is little doubt her treatment gave her a bonus six years and enabled her to watch her daughter grow into a beautiful woman and world star. Now there will be an extra poignancy when Diana sings 'Cry Me A River'.
One of my favorite detective writers is T. Jefferson Parker who has experienced the trauma of cancer within his own family. His new novel 'Black Water' features a spurious cancer cure, but in a previous novel 'Summer of Fear' he writes some very compelling segments about someone facing the reality of cancer. "It was cancer. And I'll tell you something - I hate it. I even hate the word cancer, the way it hisses off our tongues, so eager to be said. I didn't create it, no matter what these these these bliss ninnies try to make me believe. They're selling snake oil in a New Age wrapper, that's all. They're in the cancer business, the phony-hope trade. I'll take the rap for almost anything - I'm a Mexican and a Catholic, right? But I refuse to take the blame anymore for this. I'm going to win; I'm going to beat this thing. Damn those people, those parasites. Russ, what is it with this country? We think we control the whole world and everything on it - and beyond that, the moon, all the way from the heavens down to the metastatic level of the cells in our bodies. Where did we ever get so arrogant to believe that? Did it do any good? What did it get us but a place stripped of the people and animals who used to live here, a sky full of satellites and floating junk, a nation full of people who believe they can cure cancer by eating right? How can we be so arrogant to believe that cancer is our own fault? I want to live, Russ. I'm going to beat this thing. But I'm not going to accept responsibility for what's happened. I feel invaded. I feel cheated. I love you and I love life, but I hate what's happened to me. I'm going to fight with the tools I've got - love and hate. That's what I've got for weapons. You know what cancer is? Cancer is little cells growing where they shouldn't. Nobody knows why they start or how to stop them, but nobody can cure a cold, either. Cancer is not a symptom. Cancer is not a metaphor. It is not a theme. Mailer said that cancer is the growth of madness denied. Mailer is full of shit. The only thing cancer is for sure is bad luck. It's a vicious little bastard and I want it out of me. This is not a journey into myself to discover my secret desire to die." I don't necessarily agree with all the sentiments, but it's a good reflection of the anger, frustration and desperation that cancer can provoke in a person. Major Sources
|
|
THE SLOW FOOD MOVEMENT By Dr. Martin Collis, Ph.D. "If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing slowly." - Mae West
"Why do the French enjoy escargots? Because they don't like fast food!" A bad pun, but a reminder that there are viable alternatives to the homogenization and standardization of foods and the gulp and run style of eating promoted by fast food franchises. The way many people eat has changed more in the past 40 years than in the previous 40 thousand. In the name of expediency, progress and profit margins we are consuming meats from animals raised on anti-biotics, pesticide drenched fruit and vegetables and genetically modified 'Franken foods.' As Eric Schlosser points out in his must read book, 'Fast Food Nation' (see a summary of this book in 'Recommended Reading', Fall 2001 edition of Well), now out in paperback, the taste of your fast food will probably not come from the food itself, but will be 'enhanced' and 'modified' by a 'flavourist.' Writing in my local newspaper, the Victoria Times Colonist, Pam Frier notes that, 'Processed food that's been canned, frozen and dehydrated is essentially food devoid of flavor. A mammoth "replace-the-taste" industry has evolved as a result." The Silicon Valley of the flavor replacement industry is found among the plastics factories and pharmaceutical companies in the industrial desert of New Jersey. With a little amyl valerate, benzyl isobutylute, dipropyl ketone and a few more selected chemicals you have a 'strawberry' flavored milkshake. Want that "deep fried in beef fat" taste for a McDonald's french fry that's fried in vegetable oil, no problem. There is even a machine called a universal TA-XT2 Texture Analyzer, which is essentially a mechanical mouth to help develop the appropriate 'mouth-feel.' If the creaminess or crispiness isn't quite acceptable to its sensors it's easily 'texture-corrected' with the addition of appropriate fats, gums, emulsifiers and stabilizers. This bland leading the bland fast food culture has evolved from the convenience of occasional meal replacement to a mainstream source of nutrition for millions of people and plays a major role in the obesity epidemic. It is not surprising that resistance to the 'instant gratification', 'more is better', eating mind-set has led to the formation of the Slow Food movement. I became aware of the Slow Food movement when I saw an advertisement for cheese and honey tasting at a festival on Vancouver Island, promoted by the local chapter of the Slow Food movement. I visited the Slow Food web site at www.slowfood.com and discovered that what I was seeing in my hometown was a local manifestation of a global movement. The birth of Slow Food was triggered by the appearance of a McDonald's in Rome's Piazza di Spagna in 1986. This prompted Carlo Petrini to create an organization for those who love food and know that love takes time.
There is nothing precious or pretentious about Slow Food. It is about appreciating and enjoying one of life's great pleasures. (Remember there are more books written about food than sex.) This can mean helping maintain regional cuisine, supporting retail outlets and restaurants who show concern for the quality, variety and uniqueness of their food and participating in an initiative called the Ark of Taste which is attempting to identify and catalogue products and dishes that are in danger of disappearing. It is easy to appreciate that higher yields from grains, more milk from faster developing livestock and pest resistant plants might be part of the fight against hunger in the world. The Slow Food movement is there to remind us that bigger, faster and more is not always better and that diversity is part of the picture. An example of this, is the Slow Foods' championing of the Piedmontese cow in Europe. The Piedmontese cow produces superb cheese and high quality beef but was disappearing because of the popularity of the Holstein cow which produced more milk and was ready for slaughter more quickly. Slow Food supported a group of 16 farmers to raise Piedmontese cows and encouraged them to use organic and natural methods to raise and feed the animals. When mad cow disease struck, the Peidmontese offered a safe alternative to the speed produced beef. For as we subsequently discovered mad cow disease had its origins in the feeding and living conditions of some cattle. Because the cows take longer to mature Piedmontese beef costs about $0.50 a pound more than speed beef. But in addition to buying safety and flavor you get many other health benefits.
As Bob Dylan once noted, "Hunger pays a heavy price to the falling Gods of speed and steel." Fast food is a totally dollar driven industry and it's challenging to market healthy food to a nation exposed to billions of dollars of promotion for the cheap gratification of adult pablum. However, there is always a market for quality and as the wellness and slow food movements gain momentum so do the opportunities to market good food. A notable success story is Whole Foods Market Inc. who have spread throughout the US and has just arrived in Canada with an outlet in the Yorkville area of Toronto.
One thing I like about Whole Foods is that they treat their employees well, offering a variety of creative benefit packages. This is in direct contrast to a number of fast food giants who've lobbied furiously to keep the minimum wage as low as possible and then looked for loopholes to pay some employees even less.
"Well" Goes to Provence
On behalf of our 5000 plus 'Well' readers, Nancy and I went to the cradle of Slow Food, the Rhone Valley in Provence, where vineyards carpet the landscape, with the vines linking arms in an endless one legged vine dance and the air is stained with the scent of honeysuckle, broom, wild thyme and roses; and poppies turn fields in magic scarlet carpets. The shops and markets shut at mid-day and re-open around 3:00pm and food and wine are a way of life, the locals do not need to be reminded of Paul Simons' "Slow down you move too fast." We stayed in a neighbouring village to Patricia Wells, a high priestess of Provencal cooking. Her philosophy of food sounds like a Slow Food manifesto. "Keep it fresh, keep it simple, respect the seasons and allow the integrity of the ingredients to shine through. (e.g. Don't drown the meal in 'special sauce'.) Her 4 'f's' are, "food, family, friends and feasts."
I'm a surprising person to be writing this piece, as I come from the American male school of cooking, where I didn't necessarily go to fast food joints, but I liked my food fast. My modus operandi of cooking was 'double the temperature, halve the time.' The microwave was my friend. However, I married a 'foodie' who knows chefs like I know soccer players and she is my gastronomic guide. We dined in little restaurants among the vineyards, where we ate marinated mussels, each of which were tied up and presented like little gifts and foie gras which defies description. (Using words to describe food is like using music to describe architecture.) But it was the cheeses and breads, the tomatoes and croissants which were the daily delights. We were living among people who shop for bread twice a day and take 2 1/2 hours for lunch. Nancy and I shopped at the markets almost every day and I played the role of sous chef. What a remarkable species we humans are who can take the necessities of food and drink and turn them into pleasures and treasures and ultimately to art forms. A Market Driven Economy Deconstructing the Mystery of French Markets Through the eyes of an economist, logistics expert, town planner or any bureaucratic bean counter, the typical French market is inefficient, nonsensical and a formula for failure. The formula goes like this: take a town with streets narrower than aisles at Wal-Mart and minimal parking and fill it with hundreds of stalls. They are attractive and feature fresh food and an endless variety of other merchandise from necessities to objects d'art. This attracts thousands of people who come into town with their cars, children and shopping baskets. The market stalls take up most of the available space, so parking has to be innovative and some distance from the action. By 9:00 am the town is filling up and lines are forming at the more popular stalls. Each individual purchase can take as long as buying a week's worth of groceries at Safeway. There are no shopping carts, as there is no room, and no credit cards accepted, this is strictly a cash and carry enterprise. Yoked by their baskets the customers move from stall to stall checking off items from their lists. Towards mid-day the town is clogged with customers and you have that magic merchandising shopper/vendor interface where cash is flying over the counters. The markets respond to the customer feeding frenzy by closing down, not for lunch, but for another time, another town, another day. Show's over. This means that the café's and bistros are instantly full, so most people trudge off in search of their cars and a crowded drive home.
Then why do the markets work so well? The markets flourish because much of France is a cuisine driven culture, whereas North America is a convenience driven culture, where shelf life is more important than self-life. Many North Americans eat to live; millions of French citizens live to eat. For lovers of food and wine the markets have their own form of convenience. The convenience of having the 10 best producers of olives and olive oil in the region to select from. The convenience of being able to taste test 20 different cheeses and to talk to the person who created them. There are no degrees of separation between the producer and the purchaser, because the producer literally stands behind their product and will sell it to you. Quality and price are controlled by competition; if the peppers and tomatoes on one stall are substandard or expensive, there will be plenty of alternatives a few steps away.
Each market is an event, with energy, entertainment and a sense of community and communication. Ask a supermarket employee for help with a product and they'll direct you to the appropriate aisle, ask someone at the market and you might be invited to their farm or vineyard. After a wine tasting at the Uzes market we were invited to the vineyard of third generation vintner Luc Reynaud who is producing some astounding wines. Luc was preparing for bottling the next day, but took the time to take us out into his fields and explain how the leaf structure and method of staking different varietals provide optimal growing conditions for the sugars and tannins in his grapes. If you ever find wine labeled Domaine Reynaud buy all you can get.
Could this concept be successful in mainstream North America? Not a chance! Producing and marketing products this way is too labor intensive, you can't franchise fruit stalls, you'd need multi-story parking for all the S.U.V.'s (which barely exist in France). There would be pages of bylaws and city ordinances to prevent the placement of a market in the middle of town (not to mention hostility and litigation from nearby stores and franchises) and even if you could overcome all these problems, the customers would not, and in some cases could not, walk for a couple of hours carrying their shopping. So the markets will remain another part of l'exception francaise. As an aside, I couldn't help noticing that overweight and obesity were radically less among the market customers than you would typically see in a North American supermarket. This was not a fat free population but they looked pretty good. Food I'm sure was a factor in this, but there is one other possible reason. When I checked my pedometer at lunch after a morning in the market I had already walked over 8,000 steps and burned about 400 calories. Conclusion Ultimately, the answer is not fast food or slow food but good food. The leisurely pace of the Rhone Valley cannot be exported to the USA, each country and culture must seek its own nutritional salvation. The overall numbers in North America are bad but here are signs of hope, the organic islands are getting bigger in the supermarkets, juice bars and vegetarian restaurants are multiplying and there's a growing realization that good nutrition need not be bad business. The Japanese style boxed lunch called Bento is now gaining popularity in North America. Bento is typically a healthy mix of veggies, sushi, rice and sometimes grilled meats. Individually people could use Aretha's solution of a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T for their marvelous body/minds and be more conscious of what they eat and drink. The reduction in smoking has been a North American success story and it's been relatively easy to demonize the big bad cigarette manufacturers. But taking on the fast food empires is a lot harder. People don't have to smoke to live, but they do have to eat. No research could show that a few hamburgers and fries were bad for your health, so what we're dealing with is a dosage problem. Taxation of fast foods is a hot discussion topic in recent editorials, and a number of US states are funding wellness initiatives by taxing soft drinks. In Europe an increasing number of countries are banning junk food ads from children's TV programming. But it's difficult to legislate common sense and it's impossible to legislate cultural preferences. Until people figure out that they don't want to be fat, diabetic and vulnerable to chronic disease and that they can change their lives by better food selection and increased physical activity, little change will occur. Until parents understand that one of the great gifts they can give their children is an appreciation for good food and exercise (this is best achieved by example) we will continue to breed ever- increasing numbers of bloated kids. As long as we sit our kids in front of TV screens and allow their developing minds to absorb 10,000 fast food messages a year they, and we, will have problems. If low cost and high convenience are the dominant criteria in our food choices our health care system will buckle under the weight. Bon appetit.
"Finally, a food label I can understand! Each serving contains 10 grams of fat and 5 grams of thin."
"Slow Food' Registration Form:
Annual subscription fee: individual $60USD, $90CAD and couple $75USD,
$110 CAD Recommended reading: "Best of Slow" (www.chelseagreen.com) "Utne Reader" June 2002 edition (www.utne.com) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
At Speakwell we're proud of our employees, and it's exciting to us when former members of the Speakwell family succeed in their chosen fields. Dino Asproloupos Dino is completing the International MBA program at York University in Toronto, ON. (http://www.yorku.ca) Following Martin's footsteps as a speaker, Dino won 1st prize ($6,000 US) and a scholarship for his recent presentation at the 32nd Annual International Students' Symposium in St. Gallen, Switzerland. The audience was made up of business and international leaders from around the world, including the President of Estonia, the Secretary General of NATO, CEOs of Nestle, Greenpeace, Deutsche Bank, Oracle, Zurich Financial and 250 graduate students from around the world (http://www.isc-symposium.org). Guy LeMasurier Guy is completing his Ph.D. at Arizona State University East Campus and managing the Physical Activity Center (http://www.east.asu.edu/reccenter). He was Graduate Teaching Assistantship of the year in the Exercise and Wellness Department at ASU East. Guy received, for the 2nd year, the graduate academic scholarship and recently presented the theme of his Master's thesis at the American College of Sports Medicine National Conference in St. Louis titled, The Dose-Response Relationship Between Short Duration High-Intensity Exercise and Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC). (http://www.acsm.org). Guy also published his first paper with Dr. Charles Corbin in the International Journal of Physical Education titled Health-Based Physical Education 2002. |
|
|
|
More Thoughts on 10,000 Steps By Martin Collis, PhD "The length of my walking is the length of my writing," Charles Dickens said, no wonder 'Well' is more voluminous than most online webzines. My 10,000 steps are a daily stimulus to unlocking and unblocking the thoughts stored in the protein stacks of my mind. I love my little pedometer, which is with me every step of my way and dutifully records the 'walk of life.' "Every
step you take The concept of a pedometer is not new and there were research models as far back as the 1920's. While in New York I found a matchbook from the 1950's, which featured a pedometer. I don't know how accurate it was, but you can't beat the price at $3.99.
We found the following: 1. The pedometers were accurate in recording the number of steps we took.
Martin estimated his stride at 3.0 ft (0.91m) and Trina at 2.5 ft (0.76m). In fact both Martin and Trina's stride length averaged out to around 2.75 ft (0.84m). 2. Pedometer Actual
Obviously it is important to get a good estimate of stride length and Ben suggests the following technique. Using a 400m track, you do one lap for warm-up and then count the total number of strides on a second lap. Divide 1312.3 (the number of feet in 400m) by the number of strides in 400m to calculate your stride length in feet (make adjustments depending whether or not your pedometer is metric). 3. The most interesting statistic to me was the caloric cost of 10,000 steps. Energy expenditure was calculated using measured oxygen consumption and respiratory quotient, as well as with the energy expenditure table of McCardle, Katch and Katch for walking at 3.5 mph (5.6kmph).
Not perfect, Martin's pedometer reading was slightly high and Trina's significantly underestimated the caloric cost of her steps. But this is near enough for day to day living. Rule of Thumb. Caloric Estimate for 10,000 Steps
One of the positive things about being heavy is that you burn more calories getting from A to B than the lightweights. My average heart rate for the walk was 72 beats per minute (bpm) and Trina's was 114 bpm as she worked a little harder with her shorter legs. NOTE. When I jog my stride lengthens and, unless
I adjust the pedometer, it will underestimate the distance traveled and
calories burned. If you don't own a pedometer you can estimate your steps on a walk by counting them for a minute and seeing how many minutes you walk.
People often have no idea of how long it takes to walk off the calories of some typical popular food and drinks.
Watch out for the dressing and spreads, which sometimes accompany healthy sounding foods. Tim Hortons' donuts range from 220 - 380 calories, so why not have a "Tim's Own" Garden Vegetable Sandwich? The reason why not, is that the sandwich, in addition to shredded lettuce, tomato and cucumber, comes with a bunch of cream cheese and "special creamy dressing." (information from Nutrition Action)
I have a regular route, which I jog or walk on a daily basis. In any given week I probably see more than a hundred people walking their dogs and I am something of an anomaly exercising with no dog in tow. I would guess that dogs, and the fact that people walk them on a regular basis, do more for the health of Canadians and Americans than billions of dollars of medication. I used to think that Lassie was the only dog that saved lives, but there's millions of them. It's an odd culture where walking is an unusual activity. I was recently approached by security at the Toronto Airport wanting to know what I was doing walking round an empty parking lot. The security officer didn't seem very convinced by my 10,000 steps explanation, so I told him I had a heart condition and my doctor had told me to walk everyday. "O.K., carry on sir."
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Globesity: Fats and Figures B.M.I. Body Mass Index or Body Mass Inflation?
"Five foot seven, 204 pounds I'd say you could put on another five or six pounds."
Fast Food Industry Growth Since 1980
Good reading: "Fixing a Fat Nation" by Tom Farley and Deborah
Cohen. As usual Dave Barry has his own perspective on problems associated with body image and weight loss. See article 'Never Turn Your Back'. Some of his books include:
|
|
|
|
Cancer Case Study By Nancy Wardle, MD One of my patients likes to say that he is four years, a few months, weeks, and days past his expiry date. Told some time ago, after being diagnosed with metastatic colon cancer, that he needed to get his affairs in order, he decided that this meant starting to live what time was left to him differently. He began to understand and practice one of my favourite definitions of health, namely that health is "not just the absence of pain or illness, but rather, living the best life possible, whatever the circumstances." He, rather indelicately, pointed out that he'd gone through life controlling things and, "By being and asshole. But they've taken it out, so now I have to find a different approach." His medical team, alopathic and complementary, were in charge of helping him eradicate much, if not all, cancer from his body. He was in charge of doing whatever he could, not necessarily to "beat" his cancer, but to move beyond his fear of it and its impact on his life. That meant moving out of a normal and understandable state of fear based reaction, into a more 'how can I best handle this' responsive state. This was especially important when it came to dealing with one of the more persistent and difficult consequences of multiple surgeries, chemotherapy and radiation .. fatigue. More than pain and more than nausea, his profound loss/lack of energy interfered with his efforts to live well. "Fatigue makes cowards of us all." Vince Lombardi Cancer patients consistently report that of all
the problems they face, fatigue is the greatest and can be even more debilitating
than pain and/or nausea. For him, and for others like him, living well with cancer started with the awareness that, until he accepted the diagnosis, he couldn't defy the prognosis. At the moment of acceptance, his experience with cancer became what psychologist, Lawrence LeShan, calls a 'turning point'. This signified that he was ready to take up the challenge and respond to the unique call to action on his own behalf: mentally, physically and spiritually. Accepting his fatigue did not mean he liked it, and dealing with it on a daily basis and moving through it required a shift in perspective. His life became a progression of little victories, getting out of bed and to the bathroom one day, (an early mantra was, 'mind over mattress'), next extending his range to the kitchen and then to the garden. He had to 'show up' and live in the moment each day, learning to pace himself and gradually push his recovery boundaries. This was a new life, not to be compared to his physical performance in his previous pre-cancer life. New ways of inhabiting his body/mind and living well presented themselves, yoga replaced his old timers hockey games and he found wisdom in an old admonishment 'walk, don't run'. He learned to use the breath to release, renew and fuel his body. Rest became reasonable and honourable because it allowed for improved recovery. Through setbacks and achievements, recurrences and remissions, he decided to follow Auden's advice and "stagger on, rejoicing" or as he liked to say, "I looked at it this way, if I was vertical that meant I was six feet up, not under." |
|
|
|
Acronyms C.A.N.C.E.R. There are many similarities between the lifestyle and mindset for cancer prevention and cancer treatment. These can be summed up by the acronym C.A.N.C.E.R. C. Choice A. Attitude The greatest discovery of my generation
is that human beings can alter their lives by altering their attitudes
of mind. N. Nutrition C. Control of Stress E. Exercise R. Relationships
|
|
| |
My Favorite Things A mixed bag this issue. 1. Amazon.com I like its web site, I like the suggestions they make based on my past book purchases. I like the fact that you have an option to buy new or used books and CD's. (Book publishers don't like this.) I like the customer service and I like the CEO, Jeff Bezos. Bezos went from poster boy to piñata when Amazon stock went from over $100 US to just over $5.00 post 9/11. But he's stuck with his business model and built an organization with whom it's tough to compete. They owe a lot of money, but are edging towards profitability and I'm betting they succeed. Another thing I like about Bezos is that his Seattle office is on the 11th floor and he never uses the elevator. 2. Robin Williams HBO Special This will be aired on July 14th and is a sure-fire winner. Laughter is a big part of wellness, which will make this a very healthy show. While in New York, Nancy and I paid big bucks to see Robin Williams' first stand-up in 15 years. Describing his performance in the New Yorker (8 April 2002) John Lahr wrote, "As a spectator, you have to hang on tight; there are no signposts for the emotional-intellectual switchbacks and no rests. Williams is the ringmaster of his own haunted internal world and the whirlwind of the extraordinary is his natural climate."
We bumped into Robin and his wife while shopping in Soho. I told him we had tickets to see him that night and he thanked us profusely for coming to see his show instead of watching the Oscars on TV. (The Oscars could surely benefit from his talent.) I wish I'd remembered to thank him for "Dead Poet's Society", my favorite of his 40 odd films, but that happens in those brief brushes with fame. As we left the store, ever in character, he held the door open for us saying, "And thank you for shopping Casa Armani." Robin is now a regular at Glide Church in San Francisco (see the "Georgia On My Mind" article in the Summer 2000 edition of 'Well'). 3. The 2002 World Cup Albert Camus, the French existentialist said, "What I know most surely about morality and the duty of man, I owe to soccer." Amen to that. Growing up in London soccer was my lifeline, and the first poem I ever wrote aged 10 began.
America does not 'get' soccer like the rest of the world, it's too hard to control, it's not media friendly with time-outs for commercial breaks and it's become a sort of shorthand for happy suburban families, rather than the passion of the masses. Evidence of this is already emerging, after Senegal beat France the President of Senegal declared a national holiday, but after U.S.A. upset favoured Portugal, Bush didn't even manage a phone call, but said he was "aware" of the result. Despite the fact that the USA has qualified as one of the final 32 teams, few people could name even one player, or the coach. This would be unthinkable in the other 31 countries. I have been in no North American sports arena where the passion of the fans even remotely approached the intensity of a soccer crowd, who need no cheerleaders, marching bands or amplified sound effects to orchestrate their songs, chants and other-worldly roar. I will be getting up at strange times to see the major games live from South Korea and Japan, and envying Steve Nash and some friends who have tickets for the all England games. For me a defining moment will be 4:30 am (West Coast time) on June 7th when England walks onto the field against Argentina. The 8,000 English supporters who have travelled to Japan will be singing "God save our gracious team" and my goose-bumps will be being shared with millions of others. England v. Argentina at football attracts much more interest than the Falklands War. (The Argentine military actually used the football song 'Vamos vamos Argentina' to try to boost their morale.) It's easy to go on about the history which includes the brawl in '66 ('Britania Waives the Rules.'), the 'Hand of God' goal by Maradona in '86, and two huge controversies involving clashes between Spice boy, soccer genius David Beckham and Argentine defenders. It will be riveting stuff with strategy, passion, despair, exultation, and skills so sublime they can make you weep. Soccer is not called 'the beautiful game' without reason. Organized sport is one of the great achievements of our species and soccer with its minimal equipment and simple rules is the ultimate game. (In the rest of the world soccer is called football, but this leads to confusion in North America. The word 'soccer' is derived from the 'soc' in association football, which is the correct terminology for the 'beautiful game.') Late Note. As the excitement mounts, even George W. Bush called Mexican President Vicente Fox prior to the start of the USA vs. Mexico game.
| |
|
|
Poetry
|
|
|
Quotations
|